Ohhh good question! I’m not sure but I think I’d be allowed. The disease I’m working on, angelman syndrome, was discovered by Harry Angelman so I think it’s normal to name a disease or drug after the person that discovered it
In the past microbiologists would jump at the chance to name a bacteria after themselves! Some examples would be the genus Akkermansia (Antoon Akkermans, a Dutch microbiologist), Barnesiella (Ella M. Barnes, British microbiologist) or Escherichia (This is what the ‘E’ stands for in E. coli! Named after Theodor Escherich, a German physician).
Nowadays scientists try to be a bit less person-centric when naming new species. Some newly discovered bacteria have been named after the place they were discovered in, like Campylobacter corcagiensis (discovered in Cork in CIT!) or Staphylococcus cornubiensis (isolated in Cornwall).
Sometimes if you find a new strain of bacteria they might put your initials in the strain number e.g. E. coli KF123. I have a friend who always says if she finds a new bacteria she wants to put in the initials of her dogs’ names!
Comments