if you weren’t a scientist, would you consider being a historian or an archaeologist?

Question: if you weren't a scientist, would you consider being a historian or an archaeologist?
- Keywords:
  archaeologist,
  historian,
  history
Asked by yawn42cup to Diarmuid on 19 Nov 2019.
- Diarmuid Kenny answered on 19 Nov 2019:
  
  Historian, definetely historian. I would be happy stuck in a dusty library trying to find old records to support evidence for something. Also, I like the idea of wearing a tweed coat with patches. 😛

Question: if you weren't a scientist, would you consider being a historian or an archaeologist?